mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-10-07 22:37:45 -04:00
sched/numa: Continue PTE scanning even if migrate rate limited
Avoiding marking PTEs pte_numa because a particular NUMA node is migrate rate limited sees like a bad idea. Even if this node can't migrate anymore other nodes might and we want up-to-date information to do balance decisions. We already rate limit the actual migrations, this should leave enough bandwidth to allow the non-migrating scanning. I think its important we keep up-to-date information if we're going to do placement based on it. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <[email protected]> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]> Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]> Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
19a78d110d
commit
9e645ab6d0
1 file changed
-8
@@ -951,14 +951,6 @@ void task_numa_work(struct callback_head *work)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
p->node_stamp += 2 * TICK_NSEC;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Do not set pte_numa if the current running node is rate-limited.
|
||||
* This loses statistics on the fault but if we are unwilling to
|
||||
* migrate to this node, it is less likely we can do useful work
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (migrate_ratelimited(numa_node_id()))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
start = mm->numa_scan_offset;
|
||||
pages = sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_size;
|
||||
pages <<= 20 - PAGE_SHIFT; /* MB in pages */
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user