x86/modules: Avoid breaking W^X while loading modules

When modules and BPF filters are loaded, there is a time window in
which some memory is both writable and executable. An attacker that has
already found another vulnerability (e.g., a dangling pointer) might be
able to exploit this behavior to overwrite kernel code. Prevent having
writable executable PTEs in this stage.

In addition, avoiding having W+X mappings can also slightly simplify the
patching of modules code on initialization (e.g., by alternatives and
static-key), as would be done in the next patch. This was actually the
main motivation for this patch.

To avoid having W+X mappings, set them initially as RW (NX) and after
they are set as RO set them as X as well. Setting them as executable is
done as a separate step to avoid one core in which the old PTE is cached
(hence writable), and another which sees the updated PTE (executable),
which would break the W^X protection.

Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]>
Cc: Jessica Yu <[email protected]>
Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]>
Cc: Rik van Riel <[email protected]>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
This commit is contained in:
Nadav Amit authored and Ingo Molnar committed 2019-04-30 12:37:55 +02:00
1 parent 7298e24f90
commit f2c65fb322
4 files changed
+28 -8

No files matched your search

+21 -7
View File
@@ -668,15 +668,29 @@ void __init alternative_instructions(void)
* handlers seeing an inconsistent instruction while you patch.
*/
void *__init_or_module text_poke_early(void *addr, const void *opcode,
size_t len)
size_t len)
{
unsigned long flags;
local_irq_save(flags);
memcpy(addr, opcode, len);
local_irq_restore(flags);
sync_core();
/* Could also do a CLFLUSH here to speed up CPU recovery; but
that causes hangs on some VIA CPUs. */
if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_NX) &&
is_module_text_address((unsigned long)addr)) {
/*
* Modules text is marked initially as non-executable, so the
* code cannot be running and speculative code-fetches are
* prevented. Just change the code.
*/
memcpy(addr, opcode, len);
} else {
local_irq_save(flags);
memcpy(addr, opcode, len);
local_irq_restore(flags);
sync_core();
/*
* Could also do a CLFLUSH here to speed up CPU recovery; but
* that causes hangs on some VIA CPUs.
*/
}
return addr;
}
+1 -1
View File
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ void *module_alloc(unsigned long size)
p = __vmalloc_node_range(size, MODULE_ALIGN,
MODULES_VADDR + get_module_load_offset(),
MODULES_END, GFP_KERNEL,
PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC, 0, NUMA_NO_NODE,
PAGE_KERNEL, 0, NUMA_NO_NODE,
__builtin_return_address(0));
if (p && (kasan_module_alloc(p, size) < 0)) {
vfree(p);
+1
View File
@@ -746,6 +746,7 @@ static inline void bpf_prog_unlock_ro(struct bpf_prog *fp)
static inline void bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro(struct bpf_binary_header *hdr)
{
set_memory_ro((unsigned long)hdr, hdr->pages);
set_memory_x((unsigned long)hdr, hdr->pages);
}
static inline void bpf_jit_binary_unlock_ro(struct bpf_binary_header *hdr)
+5
View File
@@ -1950,8 +1950,13 @@ void module_enable_ro(const struct module *mod, bool after_init)
return;
frob_text(&mod->core_layout, set_memory_ro);
frob_text(&mod->core_layout, set_memory_x);
frob_rodata(&mod->core_layout, set_memory_ro);
frob_text(&mod->init_layout, set_memory_ro);
frob_text(&mod->init_layout, set_memory_x);
frob_rodata(&mod->init_layout, set_memory_ro);
if (after_init)