Frederic Weisbecker f268c3737e tick/nohz: Only check for RCU deferred wakeup on user/guest entry when needed ...

Checking for and processing RCU-nocb deferred wakeup upon user/guest
entry is only relevant when nohz_full runs on the local CPU, otherwise
the periodic tick should take care of it.

Make sure we don't needlessly pollute these fast-paths as a -3%
performance regression on a will-it-scale.per_process_ops has been
reported so far.

Fixes: 47b8ff194c (entry: Explicitly flush pending rcuog wakeup before last rescheduling point)
Fixes: 4ae7dc97f7 (entry/kvm: Explicitly flush pending rcuog wakeup before last rescheduling point)
Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

2021-05-31 10:14:49 +02:00

..

common.c

tick/nohz: Only check for RCU deferred wakeup on user/guest entry when needed

2021-05-31 10:14:49 +02:00

common.h

kernel: Implement selective syscall userspace redirection

2020-12-02 15:07:56 +01:00

kvm.c

Merge branch 'core/urgent' into core/entry

2020-11-04 18:14:52 +01:00

Makefile

kernel: Implement selective syscall userspace redirection

2020-12-02 15:07:56 +01:00

syscall_user_dispatch.c

entry: Use different define for selector variable in SUD

2021-02-06 00:21:42 +01:00