mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-09-25 21:21:09 -04:00
Waiman Long
453431a549
As said by Linus: A symmetric naming is only helpful if it implies symmetries in use. Otherwise it's actively misleading. In "kzalloc()", the z is meaningful and an important part of what the caller wants. In "kzfree()", the z is actively detrimental, because maybe in the future we really _might_ want to use that "memfill(0xdeadbeef)" or something. The "zero" part of the interface isn't even _relevant_. The main reason that kzfree() exists is to clear sensitive information that should not be leaked to other future users of the same memory objects. Rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive() to follow the example of the recently added kvfree_sensitive() and make the intention of the API more explicit. In addition, memzero_explicit() is used to clear the memory to make sure that it won't get optimized away by the compiler. The renaming is done by using the command sequence: git grep -w --name-only kzfree |\ xargs sed -i 's/kzfree/kfree_sensitive/' followed by some editing of the kfree_sensitive() kerneldoc and adding a kzfree backward compatibility macro in slab.h. [[email protected]: fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c needs linux/slab.h] [[email protected]: fix fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c some more] Suggested-by: Joe Perches <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Acked-by: David Howells <[email protected]> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <[email protected]> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]> Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <[email protected]> Cc: James Morris <[email protected]> Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]> Cc: Joe Perches <[email protected]> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]> Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> Cc: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> Cc: "Jason A . Donenfeld" <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>