[Incremental provided buffer
consumption](https://github.com/axboe/liburing/wiki/What's-new-with-io_uring-in-6.11-and-6.12#incremental-provided-buffer-consumption)
support is added in kernel 6.12.
IoUring.BufferGroup will now use incremental consumption whenever
kernel supports it.
Before, provided buffers are wholly consumed when picked. Each cqe
points to the different buffer. With this, cqe points to the part of the
buffer. Multiple cqe's can reuse same buffer.
Appropriate sizing of buffers becomes less important.
There are slight changes in BufferGroup interface (it now needs to track
current receive point for each buffer). Init requires allocator
instead of buffers slice, it will allocate buffers slice and head
pointers slice. Get and put now requires cqe becasue there we have
information will the buffer be reused.
ring.cmd_sock is generic socket operation. Two most common uses are
setsockopt and getsockopt. This provides same interface as posix
versions of this methods.
libring has also [sqe_set_flags](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/io_uring_sqe_set_flags.3.html)
method. Adding that in our io_uring_sqe. Adding sqe.link_next method for setting most common flag.
The bitcode format always uses little endian words. Prior to this commit, a
bitcode file produced on e.g. aarch64_be or s390x would fail to be loaded by
LLVM.
Windows is a ridiculous operating system designed by toddlers, and so
requires us to close all file handles in the `tmp/xxxxxxx` cache dir
before renaming it into `o/xxxxxxx`. We have a hack in place to handle
this for the main output file, but the MachO linker also outputs a file
with debug symbols, and we weren't closing it! This led to a fuckton of
CI failures when we enabled `.whole` cache mode by default for
self-hosted backends.
thanks jacob for figuring this out while i sat there
The Bernstein-Yang inversion code was meant to be used only with the
fields we currently use for the NIST curves.
But people copied that code and were confused that it didn't work as
expected with other field sizes.
It doesn't cost anything to make it work with other field sizes,
that may support in the future. So let's do it.
This also reduces the diff with the example zig code in fiat crypto.
Suggested by @Rexicon226 -- Thank you!
Simliarly to shl_with_overflow, we first SHL/SAL the integer, then
SHR/SAR it back to compare if overflow happens.
If overflow happened, set result to the upper limit to make it saturating.
Bug: #17645
Co-authored-by: Jacob Young <jacobly0@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Bingwu Zhang <xtex@aosc.io>
This reverts commit dea72d15da, reversing
changes made to ab381933c8.
The changeset does not work as advertised and does not have sufficient
test coverage.
Reopens#22822
Andrew Kelley