bpf: do not use KMALLOC_SHIFT_MAX

Commit 01b3f52157 ("bpf: fix allocation warnings in bpf maps and
integer overflow") has added checks for the maximum allocateable size.
It (ab)used KMALLOC_SHIFT_MAX for that purpose.

While this is not incorrect it is not very clean because we already have
KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE for this very reason so let's change both checks to use
KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE instead.

The original motivation for using KMALLOC_SHIFT_MAX was to work around
an incorrect KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE which could lead to allocation warnings
but it is no longer needed since "slab: make sure that KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE
will fit into MAX_ORDER".

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrey Konovalov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

kernel/bpf/arraymap.c

@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *array_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	    attr->value_size == 0 || attr->map_flags)
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 
-	if (attr->value_size >= 1 << (KMALLOC_SHIFT_MAX - 1))
+	if (attr->value_size > KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE)
 		/* if value_size is bigger, the user space won't be able to
 		 * access the elements.
 		 */

kernel/bpf/hashtab.c

@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *htab_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 		 */
 		goto free_htab;
 
-	if (htab->map.value_size >= (1 << (KMALLOC_SHIFT_MAX - 1)) -
+	if (htab->map.value_size >= KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE -
 	    MAX_BPF_STACK - sizeof(struct htab_elem))
 		/* if value_size is bigger, the user space won't be able to
 		 * access the elements via bpf syscall. This check also makes