mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-10-07 05:31:08 -04:00
arm64: perf: strip PAC when unwinding userspace
When the kernel is unwinding userspace callchains, we can't expect that the userspace consumer of these callchains has the data necessary to strip the PAC from the stored LR. This patch has the kernel strip the PAC from user stackframes when the in-kernel unwinder is used. This only affects the LR value, and not the FP. This only affects the in-kernel unwinder. When userspace performs unwinding, it is up to userspace to strip PACs as necessary (which can be determined from DWARF information). Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Kristina Martsenko <[email protected]> Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]> Cc: Ramana Radhakrishnan <[email protected]> Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
ec6e822d1a
commit
ccc4381082
2 files changed
+12
-1
No files matched your search
@@ -69,6 +69,12 @@ static inline void ptrauth_keys_switch(struct ptrauth_keys *keys)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#define ptrauth_user_pac_mask() GENMASK(54, vabits_user)
|
||||
|
||||
/* Only valid for EL0 TTBR0 instruction pointers */
|
||||
static inline unsigned long ptrauth_strip_insn_pac(unsigned long ptr)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return ptr & ~ptrauth_user_pac_mask();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#define ptrauth_thread_init_user(tsk) \
|
||||
do { \
|
||||
struct task_struct *__ptiu_tsk = (tsk); \
|
||||
@@ -80,6 +86,7 @@ do { \
|
||||
ptrauth_keys_switch(&(tsk)->thread_info.keys_user)
|
||||
|
||||
#else /* CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH */
|
||||
#define ptrauth_strip_insn_pac(lr) (lr)
|
||||
#define ptrauth_thread_init_user(tsk)
|
||||
#define ptrauth_thread_switch(tsk)
|
||||
#endif /* CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH */
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
|
||||
#include <linux/perf_event.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
|
||||
|
||||
#include <asm/pointer_auth.h>
|
||||
#include <asm/stacktrace.h>
|
||||
|
||||
struct frame_tail {
|
||||
@@ -35,6 +36,7 @@ user_backtrace(struct frame_tail __user *tail,
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct frame_tail buftail;
|
||||
unsigned long err;
|
||||
unsigned long lr;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Also check accessibility of one struct frame_tail beyond */
|
||||
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, tail, sizeof(buftail)))
|
||||
@@ -47,7 +49,9 @@ user_backtrace(struct frame_tail __user *tail,
|
||||
if (err)
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
perf_callchain_store(entry, buftail.lr);
|
||||
lr = ptrauth_strip_insn_pac(buftail.lr);
|
||||
|
||||
perf_callchain_store(entry, lr);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Frame pointers should strictly progress back up the stack
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user