The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jernej Skrabec <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jeff LaBundy <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
Since commit 03c835f498 ("i2c: Switch .probe() to not take an id
parameter") .probe() is the recommended callback to implement (again).
Reflect this in the documentation and don't mention .probe_new() any
more.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <[email protected]>
struct pwm_device::pwm is a write-only variable in the pwm core and used
nowhere apart from this and another dev_dbg. So it isn't useful to
identify the used PWM. Emit the PWM's label instead in the debug
message.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <[email protected]>
After commit b8a1a4cd5a ("i2c: Provide a temporary .probe_new()
call-back type"), all drivers being converted to .probe_new() and then
03c835f498 ("i2c: Switch .probe() to not take an id parameter")
convert back to (the new) .probe() to be able to eventually drop
.probe_new() from struct i2c_driver.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <[email protected]>
This allows to get rid of a call to pwmchip_remove() in the error path. There
is no .remove function for this driver, so this change fixes a resource leak
when a gpio-mvebu device is unbound.
Fixes: 757642f9a5 ("gpio: mvebu: Add limited PWM support")
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://msgid.link/[email protected]
While there is probably only ever a single instance of such a pcmtst
device, it's still bad style to use a static variable to store per
device data. Make use of platform_get_drvdata() and
platform_set_drvdata() which fixes a data corruption if there should be
two or more such devices (or this driver is used as a template for
another driver).
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Ivan Orlov <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Ivan Orlov <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <[email protected]>
After commit b8a1a4cd5a ("i2c: Provide a temporary .probe_new()
call-back type"), all drivers being converted to .probe_new() and then
03c835f498 ("i2c: Switch .probe() to not take an id parameter")
convert back to (the new) .probe() to be able to eventually drop
.probe_new() from struct i2c_driver.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
st_thermal_unregister() always returned zero, so convert it to return void
without any loss and then just drop the return from st_mmap_remove().
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wilczyński <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wilczyński <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wilczyński <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wilczyński <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wilczyński <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Sergio Paracuellos <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wilczyński <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wilczyński <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks.
The iproc driver always returns 0, it's just a bit hidden. So make
iproc_pcie_remove() return void instead of always zero and convert the
platform driver to the alternative remove callback that returns void and
eventually replaces the int returning callback.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wilczyński <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wilczyński <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert the dwc drivers from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
[kwilczynski: commit log]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wilczyński <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Serge Semin <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
[kwilczynski: commit log]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wilczyński <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wilczyński <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wilczyński <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wilczyński <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wilczyński <[email protected]>
After commit b8a1a4cd5a ("i2c: Provide a temporary .probe_new()
call-back type"), all drivers being converted to .probe_new() and then
03c835f498 ("i2c: Switch .probe() to not take an id parameter")
convert back to (the new) .probe() to be able to eventually drop
.probe_new() from struct i2c_driver.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <[email protected]>
Instead of preparing the clk after it was requested and unpreparing in
.probe()'s error path and .remove(), use devm_clk_get_prepared() which
copes for unpreparing automatically.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Emil Renner Berthing <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <[email protected]>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
While destroying alignment of the assignments in bridge_driver, do it
consistently and use a single space before =.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <[email protected]>
When looking at the data structs defining the different behaviours of
the GPT blocks in different SoCs it's not helpful that the same
functions are used with different names.
So drop the cpp defines and use the original names.
This commit was generated using:
perl -i -e 'my %m; while (<>) { if (/^#define (imx[a-zA-Z0-6_]*)\s(imx[a-zA-Z0-6_]*)/) {$m{$1} = $2; } else { foreach my $f (keys %m) {s/$f/$m{$f}/; } print; } }' drivers/clocksource/timer-imx-gpt.c
This patch has no effect on the generated code.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
After commit b8a1a4cd5a ("i2c: Provide a temporary .probe_new()
call-back type"), all drivers being converted to .probe_new() and then
commit 03c835f498 ("i2c: Switch .probe() to not take an id parameter")
convert back to (the new) .probe() to be able to eventually drop
.probe_new() from struct i2c_driver.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/[email protected]
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Michal Simek <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
hwicap_drv_remove() is only called for a device after hwicap_drv_probe()
returned 0. In that case dev_set_drvdata() was called (by hwicap_setup())
with a non-NULL value and so dev_get_drvdata() won't return NULL.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Michal Simek <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
hwicap_remove() is only called by hwicap_drv_remove(). Simplify by
unrolling the former into the latter function.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Michal Simek <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
After commit b8a1a4cd5a ("i2c: Provide a temporary .probe_new()
call-back type"), all drivers being converted to .probe_new() and then
commit 03c835f498 ("i2c: Switch .probe() to not take an id parameter")
convert back to (the new) .probe() to be able to eventually drop
.probe_new() from struct i2c_driver.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Peter Rosin <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
After commit b8a1a4cd5a ("i2c: Provide a temporary .probe_new()
call-back type"), all drivers being converted to .probe_new() and then
03c835f498 ("i2c: Switch .probe() to not take an id parameter") convert
back to (the new) .probe() to be able to eventually drop .probe_new() from
struct i2c_driver.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <[email protected]>
After commit b8a1a4cd5a ("i2c: Provide a temporary .probe_new()
call-back type"), all drivers being converted to .probe_new() and then
commit 03c835f498 ("i2c: Switch .probe() to not take an id parameter")
convert back to (the new) .probe() to be able to eventually drop
.probe_new() from struct i2c_driver.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
After commit b8a1a4cd5a ("i2c: Provide a temporary .probe_new()
call-back type"), all drivers being converted to .probe_new() and then
03c835f498 ("i2c: Switch .probe() to not take an id parameter")
convert back to (the new) .probe() to be able to eventually drop
.probe_new() from struct i2c_driver.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://msgid.link/[email protected]
After commit b8a1a4cd5a ("i2c: Provide a temporary .probe_new()
call-back type"), all drivers being converted to .probe_new() and then
03c835f498 ("i2c: Switch .probe() to not take an id parameter") convert
back to (the new) .probe() to be able to eventually drop .probe_new() from
struct i2c_driver.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://msgid.link/[email protected]
After commit b8a1a4cd5a ("i2c: Provide a temporary .probe_new()
call-back type"), all drivers being converted to .probe_new() and then
commit 03c835f498 ("i2c: Switch .probe() to not take an id parameter")
convert back to (the new) .probe() to be able to eventually drop
.probe_new() from struct i2c_driver.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
After commit b8a1a4cd5a ("i2c: Provide a temporary .probe_new()
call-back type"), all drivers being converted to .probe_new() and then
commit 03c835f498 ("i2c: Switch .probe() to not take an id parameter")
convert back to (the new) .probe() to be able to eventually drop
.probe_new() from struct i2c_driver.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
After commit b8a1a4cd5a ("i2c: Provide a temporary .probe_new()
call-back type"), all drivers being converted to .probe_new() and then
commit 03c835f498 ("i2c: Switch .probe() to not take an id parameter")
convert back to (the new) .probe() to be able to eventually drop
.probe_new() from struct i2c_driver.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Maximilian Luz <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
The need to handle the FSL variant of 8250 in a special way is also
present without console support. So soften the dependency for
SERIAL_8250_FSL from SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE to SERIAL_8250. To handle
SERIAL_8250=m, the FSL code can be modular, too, thus SERIAL_8250_FSL
becomes tristate.
Compiling 8250_fsl as a module requires adding a module license so this
is added, too. While add it also add a appropriate module description.
As then SERIAL_OF_PLATFORM=y + SERIAL_8250_FSL=m is a valid combination
(if COMPILE_TEST is enabled on a platform that is neither PPC, ARM nor
ARM64), the check in 8250_of.c must be weakened a bit.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
With SERIAL_8250=y and SERIAL_8250_FSL_CONSOLE=n the both
IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SERIAL_8250) and IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_SERIAL_8250)
evaluate to true and so fsl8250_handle_irq() is used. However this
function is only available if CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE=y (and thus
SERIAL_8250_FSL=y).
To prepare SERIAL_8250_FSL becoming tristate and being enabled in more
cases, check for IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_FSL) before making use
of fsl8250_handle_irq(). This check is correct with and without the
change to make SERIAL_8250_FSL modular.
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
Fixes: 66eff0ef52 ("powerpc/legacy_serial: Warn about 8250 devices operated without active FSL workarounds")
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]> # build-tested
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
After commit b8a1a4cd5a ("i2c: Provide a temporary .probe_new()
call-back type"), all drivers being converted to .probe_new() and then
03c835f498 ("i2c: Switch .probe() to not take an id parameter")
convert back to (the new) .probe() to be able to eventually drop
.probe_new() from struct i2c_driver.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
After commit b8a1a4cd5a ("i2c: Provide a temporary .probe_new()
call-back type"), all drivers being converted to .probe_new() and then
03c835f498 ("i2c: Switch .probe() to not take an id parameter") convert
back to (the new) .probe() to be able to eventually drop .probe_new() from
struct i2c_driver.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
The previous conversion back to .probe done in commit 964e186547
("regulator: Switch i2c drivers back to use .probe()") was done based on
v6.3. Since then two more drivers were added which need to be convert
back in the same way before eventually .probe_new() can be dropped from
struct i2c_driver.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
The previous conversion back to .probe() applied in commit 9abcd24002
("ASoC: Switch i2c drivers back to use .probe()") was created based on
v6.3. Since then two more drivers were added which need to be convert
back in the same way before eventually .probe_new() can be dropped from
struct i2c_driver.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
dw_mci_pltfm_remove() returned zero unconditionally. Make it return void
instead which makes its semantics a bit clearer.
Convert the drivers that use this function as .remove() callback to
.remove_new() which has the right prototype. This helps getting rid of
the platform_driver's remove callback that returns an int (which is
error prone). The other users didn't check the return value anyhow.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]>
After commit b8a1a4cd5a ("i2c: Provide a temporary .probe_new()
call-back type"), all drivers being converted to .probe_new() and then
commit 03c835f498 ("i2c: Switch .probe() to not take an id parameter")
convert back to (the new) .probe() to be able to eventually drop
.probe_new() from struct i2c_driver.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Ido Schimmel <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
There is no change in the generated code (tested on an ARCH=arm
allmodconfig build).
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <[email protected]>
After commit b8a1a4cd5a ("i2c: Provide a temporary .probe_new()
call-back type"), all drivers being converted to .probe_new() and then
commit 03c835f498 ("i2c: Switch .probe() to not take an id parameter")
convert back to (the new) .probe() to be able to eventually drop
.probe_new() from struct i2c_driver.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>
Uwe Kleine-König