commit 64f6a5d192 ("container_of: add container_of_const()
that preserves const-ness of the pointer") is nice. Let's use
it so that we don't accidentally cast away the const from our
state pointers.
The only thing I don't particularly like about container_of_const()
is that it still accepts void* in addition to the proper pointer
types, but that's how most other things in C work anyway so I
guess we can live with it.
And while at it rename the macro arguments to be a bit more
descriptive than just 'x'.
TODO: maybe convert *all* container_of() uses to container_of_const()?
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240307151810.24208-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Bspec mentions 50 us for IO wake time and 32 us for fast wake time. 32 us
is most probably wrong as it doesn't meet the specification as fast wake
time is calculated in Bspec like this:
10..16 us (precharge) + 8 us (preamble) + 4 us (phy_wake) + 20 us
(tfw_exit_latency)
Instead of using these constants calculate IO wake and fast wake for
DISPLAY_VER < 12 as well.
v3:
- do not handle < 9 separately
- add own helper for skl and tgl io buffer wake times
v2:
- initialize io/fast_wake_time for display version < 9
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240313133221.868391-4-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Current fast and IO wake lines calculation is assuming fast wake sync
length is 18 pulses. Let's improve this by checking actual length.
Add getter for IO buffer wake time and return 10 us there which was assumed
with static 42 us IO wake time. Upcoming patches will extent this for
different display versions.
Bspec: 65450
v3:
- s/get_io_buffer_wake_time/io_buffer_wake_time/ and use it directly in
calculation.
v2:
- rename io_wake_time in if block to io_buffer_wake_time
- rename get_io_wake_time to get_io_buffer_wake_time
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240313133221.868391-3-jouni.hogander@intel.com
The driver currently waits 1ms for idle patterns,
but for Xe2LPD and possibly future display IPs,
it requires a 1640us (rounded up to 2ms) timeout
whilst waiting for idle patterns for MST streams.
To simplify the code, the timeout is uniformly
increased by 1ms across all platforms/display IPs.
v1: Introduced the 2ms wait timeout.
v2: Segregated the wait timeout for platforms before & after LNL.
v3: Fixed 2 cosmetic changes.
v4: Revert to v2 design with commit message enhancements.
v5: Minor cosmetic changes to the commit message.
BSpec: 68849
Signed-off-by: Shekhar Chauhan <shekhar.chauhan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311041504.806058-1-shekhar.chauhan@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
In i915 hwmon sysfs getter path we now take a hwmon_lock, then acquire an
rpm wakeref. That results in lock inversion:
<4> [197.079335] ======================================================
<4> [197.085473] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [197.091611] 6.8.0-rc7-Patchwork_129026v7-gc4dc92fb1152+ #1 Not tainted
<4> [197.098096] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [197.104231] prometheus-node/839 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [197.109680] ffffffff82764d80 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.116939]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [197.122730] ffff88811b772a40 (&hwmon->hwmon_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hwm_energy+0x4b/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.131543]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
<4> [197.507922] Chain exists of:
fs_reclaim --> >->reset.mutex --> &hwmon->hwmon_lock
<4> [197.518528] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [197.524411] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [197.528916] ---- ----
<4> [197.533418] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.537237] lock(>->reset.mutex);
<4> [197.543376] lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
<4> [197.549682] lock(fs_reclaim);
...
<4> [197.632548] Call Trace:
<4> [197.634990] <TASK>
<4> [197.637088] dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xb0
<4> [197.640738] check_noncircular+0x15e/0x180
<4> [197.652968] check_prev_add+0xe9/0xce0
<4> [197.656705] __lock_acquire+0x179f/0x2300
<4> [197.660694] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4> [197.673009] fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
<4> [197.680478] __kmalloc+0x9a/0x350
<4> [197.689063] acpi_ns_internalize_name.part.0+0x4a/0xb0
<4> [197.694170] acpi_ns_get_node_unlocked+0x60/0xf0
<4> [197.720608] acpi_ns_get_node+0x3b/0x60
<4> [197.724428] acpi_get_handle+0x57/0xb0
<4> [197.728164] acpi_has_method+0x20/0x50
<4> [197.731896] acpi_pci_set_power_state+0x43/0x120
<4> [197.736485] pci_power_up+0x24/0x1c0
<4> [197.740047] pci_pm_default_resume_early+0x9/0x30
<4> [197.744725] pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x2d/0x90
<4> [197.753911] __rpm_callback+0x3c/0x110
<4> [197.762586] rpm_callback+0x58/0x70
<4> [197.766064] rpm_resume+0x51e/0x730
<4> [197.769542] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.773020] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.776498] rpm_resume+0x267/0x730
<4> [197.779974] __pm_runtime_resume+0x49/0x90
<4> [197.784055] __intel_runtime_pm_get+0x19/0xa0 [i915]
<4> [197.789070] hwm_energy+0x55/0x100 [i915]
<4> [197.793183] hwm_read+0x9a/0x310 [i915]
<4> [197.797124] hwmon_attr_show+0x36/0x120
<4> [197.800946] dev_attr_show+0x15/0x60
<4> [197.804509] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xb5/0x100
Acquire the wakeref before the lock and hold it as long as the lock is
also held. Follow that pattern across the whole source file where similar
lock inversion can happen.
v2: Keep hardware read under the lock so the whole operation of updating
energy from hardware is still atomic (Guenter),
- instead, acquire the rpm wakeref before the lock and hold it as long
as the lock is held,
- use the same aproach for other similar places across the i915_hwmon.c
source file (Rodrigo).
Fixes: 1b44019a93 ("drm/i915/guc: Disable PL1 power limit when loading GuC firmware")
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.5+
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240311203500.518675-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
Commit 394b4b7df9 ("drm/i915/lnl: Add CDCLK table") and commit
3d3696c0fe ("drm/i915/lnl: Start using CDCLK through PLL") started
adding support for CDCLK programming support for Xe2LPD. One final piece
is missing, which is the programming necessary for changed in the ratio
between MDCLK and CDCLK. Let's do that now.
BSpec instructs us to update MBUS_CTL and DBUF_CTL_S* registers when the
ratio between MDCLK and CDCLK changes. The updates must be done before
changing the CDCLK when decreasing the frequency; or after it when
increasing the frequency.
Ratio-related updates to MBUS_CTL also depend on the state of MBus
joining, so they are performed by either CDCLK change sequence or by
changes in MBus joining. Since one might happen independently of the
other, we need to make sure that both logics see the necessary state
values when programming that register. MBus joining logic needs to know
the MDCLK:CDCLK ratio and that's already provided via mdclk_cdclk_ratio
field of struct intel_dbuf_state.
For the CDCLK logic, we need to have something similar: we need to
propagate the status of MBus joining to struct intel_cdclk_state. Do
that by adding the field joined_mbus to struct intel_cdclk_config.
(Preferably, that field would be added to intel_cdclk_state, however
currently only intel_cdclk_config is passed down to the functions that
do the register programming. We might revisit this decision if we find
that refactoring the code to pass the whole intel_cdclk_state is worth
it.)
Bspec: 68864, 68868, 69090, 69482
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240312163639.172321-7-gustavo.sousa@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Xe2LPD always selects the CDCLK PLL as source for the MDCLK. Because of
that, the ratio between MDCLK and CDCLK is not be constant anymore. As
such, make sure to have the current ratio available in intel_dbuf_state
so that it can be used during dbuf programming.
Note that we write-lock the global state instead of serializing to a
hardware commit because a change in the ratio should be rather handled
in the CDCLK change sequence, which will need to take care of updating
the necessary registers in that case. We will implement that in upcoming
changes.
That said, changes in the MBus joining state should be handled by the
DBUF/MBUS logic, just like it is already done, but the logic will need
to know the ratio to properly update the registers.
v2:
- Make first sentence of commit message more intelligible. (Matt)
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240312163639.172321-6-gustavo.sousa@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
As of Xe2LPD, it is now possible to select the source of the MDCLK
as either the CD2XCLK or the CDCLK PLL.
Previous display IPs were hardcoded to use the CD2XCLK. For those, the
ratio between MDCLK and CDCLK remained constant, namely 2. For Xe2LPD,
when we select the CDCLK PLL as the source, the ratio will vary
according to the squashing configuration (since the cd2x divisor is
fixed for all supported configurations).
To help the transition to supporting changes in the ratio, extract the
function intel_dbuf_mdclk_cdclk_ratio_update() from the existing logic
and call it using 2 as hardcoded ratio. Upcoming changes will use that
function for updates in the ratio due to CDCLK changes.
Bspec: 50057, 69445, 49213, 68868
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240312163639.172321-5-gustavo.sousa@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Currently, only Xe2LPD uses CDCLK PLL as the source of MDCLK and
previous display IPs use the CD2XCLK. There will be changes in code
paths common to those platforms that will rely on which source is being
used. As such, let's make that information explicit with the addition of
the predicate function mdclk_source_is_cdclk_pll().
Arguably, an enum could be created, but using a boolean should suffice
here, since we there are only two possible sources and the logic that
will rely on it will be very localized.
In order to get the code into a more consistent state, let's also take
this opportunity to hook the selection of CDCLK_CTL's "MDCLK Source
Select" to that new function. Even though currently only
MDCLK_SOURCE_SEL_CDCLK_PLL will be returned, having this extra logic is
arguably better than keeping stuff untied and prone to bugs.
v2:
- Extract mdclk_source_is_cdclk_pll() out of xe2lpd_mdclk_source_sel()
to make latter only about the register's field.
Bspec: 69090, 68861
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240312163639.172321-3-gustavo.sousa@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Make debugfs vbt only shows valid vbt when read from ACPI opregion.
Make it work when read from firmware/spi/pci oprom cases. In the cases
where VBT needs to be read from spi/pci oprom, take the wakeref to
prevent WARN while reading DE registers during debugfs vbt dump.
v2: Extract getting vbt from different sources to its own function.
Protect sysfs write with vbt check(Jani)
v3: Fix CI error by probing bios vbt with runtime_pm wakeref
v4: Update commit message and skip waking up runtime while accessing
vbt from opregion/firmware(Jani)
v5: Skip grabbing unnecessary wakeref(Jani)
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240304212331.640424-1-radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com
Move all DPFC_CHICKEN programming into intel_fbc_program_workarounds().
We already have one thing programmed there, whereas the rest is strewn
about in intel_display_wa_apply() and init_clock_gating(). Since we have
a single place doing all the programming (and it's serialized by the
crtc commits) there should be no danger of rmw races.
Other FBC related workarounds also exist, but those require fiddling
with other registers that may also get programmed from other places,
so we'll need to think harder what to do with those.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240123090051.29818-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
We don't actually know whether we should be picking the PHY
simply based on the AUX_CH/power well, or based on the VBT
defined AUX_CH->DDI->PHY relationship. At the moment we are
doing the former for the ANAOVRD workaround, and the latter
for the ICL_LANE_ENABLE_AUX override. Windows seems to use the
first approach for everything. So let's unify this to follow
that same approach for both.
Eventually we should try to figure out which is actually
correct, or whether any of this even matters (ie. whether there
are any real machines where the DDI and its AUX_CH do not match
1:1).
Note that this also changes the behaviour if we do end up
poking an AUX power well not associated with any port (as
per VBT). Previously we would have skipped the PHY register
write, but now we always write it.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240229200357.7969-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Looks like the undelayed vblank gets signalled exactly when
the active period ends. That is a problem for DSB+VRR when
we are already in vblank and expect DSB to start executing
as soon as we send the push. Instead of starting, the DSB
just keeps on waiting for the undelayed vblank which won't
signal until the end of the next frame's active period,
which is far too late.
The end result is that DSB won't have even started
executing by the time the flips/etc. have completed.
We then wait for an extra 1ms, after which we terminate
the DSB and report a timeout:
[drm] *ERROR* [CRTC:80:pipe A] DSB 0 timed out waiting for idle (current head=0xfedf4000, head=0x0, tail=0x1080)
To fix this let's configure DSB to use the so called VRR
"safe window" instead of the undelayed vblank to trigger
the DSB vblank logic, when VRR is enabled.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 34d8311f4a ("drm/i915/dsb: Re-instate DSB for LUT updates")
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/9927
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240306040806.21697-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Reinstate commit 88b065943c ("drm/i915/dsi: Do display on
sequence later on icl+"), for the most part. Turns out some
machines (eg. Chuwi Minibook X) really do need that updated order.
It is also the order the Windows driver uses.
However we can't just undo the revert since that would again
break Lenovo 82TQ. After staring at the VBT sequences for both
machines I've concluded that the Lenovo 82TQ sequences look
somewhat broken:
- INIT_OTP is not present at all
- what should be in INIT_OTP is found in DISPLAY_ON
- what should be in DISPLAY_ON is found in BACKLIGHT_ON
(along with the actual backlight stuff)
The Chuwi Minibook X on the other hand has a full complement
of sequences in its VBT.
So let's try to deal with the broken sequences in the
Lenovo 82TQ VBT by simply swapping the (non-existent)
INIT_OTP sequence with the DISPLAY_ON sequence. Thus we
execute DISPLAY_ON when intending to execute INIT_OTP,
and execute nothing at all when intending to execute
DISPLAY_ON. That should be 100% equivalent to the
revert, for such broken VBTs.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: dc524d0597 ("Revert "drm/i915/dsi: Do display on sequence later on icl+"")
References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/10071
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/10334
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240305083659.8396-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
