ARM's v8.2 Extentions add support for Reliability, Availability and
Serviceability (RAS). On CPUs with these extensions system software
can use additional barriers to isolate errors and determine if faults
are pending. Add cpufeature detection.
Platform level RAS support may require additional firmware support.
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Xie XiuQi <[email protected]>
[Rebased added config option, reworded commit message]
Signed-off-by: James Morse <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
According to the Intel SDM Volume 3B (253669-063US, July 2017), action
optional (SRAO) errors can be reported either via MCE or CMC:
In cases when SRAO is signaled via CMCI the error signature is
indicated via UC=1, PCC=0, S=0.
Type(*1) UC EN PCC S AR Signaling
---------------------------------------------------------------
UC 1 1 1 x x MCE
SRAR 1 1 0 1 1 MCE
SRAO 1 x(*2) 0 x(*2) 0 MCE/CMC
UCNA 1 x 0 0 0 CMC
CE 0 x x x x CMC
NOTES:
1. SRAR, SRAO and UCNA errors are supported by the processor only
when IA32_MCG_CAP[24] (MCG_SER_P) is set.
2. EN=1, S=1 when signaled via MCE. EN=x, S=0 when signaled via CMC.
And there is a description in 15.6.2 UCR Error Reporting and Logging, for
bit S:
S (Signaling) flag, bit 56 - Indicates (when set) that a machine check
exception was generated for the UCR error reported in this MC bank...
When the S flag in the IA32_MCi_STATUS register is clear, this UCR error
was not signaled via a machine check exception and instead was reported
as a corrected machine check (CMC).
So merge the two cases and just remove the S=0 check for SRAO in
mce_severity().
[ Borislav: Massage commit message.]
Signed-off-by: Xie XiuQi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Chen Wei <[email protected]>
Cc: linux-edac <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
We meet this compile warning, which caused by missing bpf.h in xdp.h.
In file included from ./include/trace/events/xdp.h:10:0,
from ./include/linux/bpf_trace.h:6,
from drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c:29:
./include/trace/events/xdp.h:93:17: warning: ‘struct bpf_map’ declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration
const struct bpf_map *map, u32 map_index),
^
./include/linux/tracepoint.h:187:34: note: in definition of macro ‘__DECLARE_TRACE’
static inline void trace_##name(proto) \
^~~~~
./include/linux/tracepoint.h:352:24: note: in expansion of macro ‘PARAMS’
__DECLARE_TRACE(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args), \
^~~~~~
./include/linux/tracepoint.h:477:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘DECLARE_TRACE’
DECLARE_TRACE(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args))
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/tracepoint.h:477:22: note: in expansion of macro ‘PARAMS’
DECLARE_TRACE(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args))
^~~~~~
./include/trace/events/xdp.h:89:1: note: in expansion of macro ‘DEFINE_EVENT’
DEFINE_EVENT(xdp_redirect_template, xdp_redirect,
^~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/trace/events/xdp.h:90:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘TP_PROTO’
TP_PROTO(const struct net_device *dev,
^~~~~~~~
./include/trace/events/xdp.h:93:17: warning: ‘struct bpf_map’ declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration
const struct bpf_map *map, u32 map_index),
^
./include/linux/tracepoint.h:203:38: note: in definition of macro ‘__DECLARE_TRACE’
register_trace_##name(void (*probe)(data_proto), void *data) \
^~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/tracepoint.h:354:4: note: in expansion of macro ‘PARAMS’
PARAMS(void *__data, proto), \
^~~~~~
Reported-by: Huang Daode <[email protected]>
Cc: Hanjun Guo <[email protected]>
Fixes: 8d3b778ff5 ("xdp: tracepoint xdp_redirect also need a map argument")
Signed-off-by: Xie XiuQi <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Today SError is taken using the inv_entry macro that ends up in
bad_mode.
SError can be used by the RAS Extensions to notify either the OS or
firmware of CPU problems, some of which may have been corrected.
To allow this handling to be added, add a do_serror() C function
that just panic()s. Add the entry.S boiler plate to save/restore the
CPU registers and unmask debug exceptions. Future patches may change
do_serror() to return if the SError Interrupt was notification of a
corrected error.
Signed-off-by: Xie XiuQi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wang Xiongfeng <[email protected]>
[Split out of a bigger patch, added compat path, renamed, enabled debug
exceptions]
Signed-off-by: James Morse <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Currently we print the runnable task in /proc/sched_debug, but
there is no task state information.
We don't know which task is in the runqueue and which task is sleeping.
Add task state in the runnable task list, like this:
runnable tasks:
S task PID tree-key switches prio wait-time sum-exec sum-sleep
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
S watchdog/239 1452 -11.917445 2811 0 0.000000 8.949306 0.000000 7 0 /
S migration/239 1453 20686.367740 8 0 0.000000 16215.720897 0.000000 7 0 /
S ksoftirqd/239 1454 115383.841071 12 120 0.000000 0.200683 0.000000 7 0 /
>R test 21287 4872.190970 407 120 0.000000 4874.911790 0.000000 7 0 /autogroup-150
R test 21288 4868.385454 401 120 0.000000 3672.341489 0.000000 7 0 /autogroup-150
R test 21289 4868.326776 384 120 0.000000 3424.934159 0.000000 7 0 /autogroup-150
Signed-off-by: Xie XiuQi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Zhang Liguang reported the following issue:
1) System detects a CMCI storm on the current CPU.
2) Kernel disables the CMCI interrupt on banks owned by the
current CPU and switches to poll mode
3) After the CMCI storm subsides, kernel switches back to
interrupt mode
4) We expect the system to reenable the CMCI interrupt on banks
owned by the current CPU
mce_intel_adjust_timer
|-> cmci_reenable
|-> cmci_discover # owned banks are ignored here
static void cmci_discover(int banks)
...
for (i = 0; i < banks; i++) {
...
if (test_bit(i, owned)) # ownd banks is ignore here
continue;
So convert cmci_storm_disable_banks() to
cmci_toggle_interrupt_mode() which controls whether to enable or
disable CMCI interrupts with its argument.
NB: We cannot clear the owned bit because the banks won't be
polled, otherwise. See:
27f6c573e0 ("x86, CMCI: Add proper detection of end of CMCI storms")
for more info.
Reported-by: Zhang Liguang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Xie XiuQi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]> # v3.15+
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Tony Luck <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: linux-edac <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
RAS user space tools like rasdaemon which base on trace event, could
receive mce error event, but no memory recovery result event. So, I want
to add this event to make this scenario complete.
This patch add a event at ras group for memory-failure.
The output like below:
# tracer: nop
#
# entries-in-buffer/entries-written: 2/2 #P:24
#
# _-----=> irqs-off
# / _----=> need-resched
# | / _---=> hardirq/softirq
# || / _--=> preempt-depth
# ||| / delay
# TASK-PID CPU# |||| TIMESTAMP FUNCTION
# | | | |||| | |
mce-inject-13150 [001] .... 277.019359: memory_failure_event: pfn 0x19869: recovery action for free buddy page: Delayed
[[email protected]: fix build error]
Signed-off-by: Xie XiuQi <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
Cc: Tony Luck <[email protected]>
Cc: Chen Gong <[email protected]>
Cc: Jim Davis <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Xie XiuQi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Commit 6bfc09e232 ("rcu: Provide RCU CPU stall warnings for tiny RCU")
moved the rcu_cpu_stall_timeout module parameter from rcutree.c to
rcupdate.c, but failed to update Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.txt. This
commit therefore repairs this omission.
commit 96224daa16 ("documentation: Update sysfs path for rcu_cpu_stall_suppress")
updated the path for rcu_cpu_stall_suppress, but failed to update for
rcu_cpu_stall_timeout.
Signed-off-by: Xie XiuQi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
Commit 69361eef90 ("panic: add TAINT_SOFTLOCKUP") added the 'L' flag,
but failed to update the comments for print_tainted(). So, update the
comments.
Signed-off-by: Xie XiuQi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Loading ipmi_si module while bmc is disconnected, we found the timeout
is longer than 5 secs. Actually it takes about 3 mins and 20
secs.(HZ=250)
error message as below:
Dec 12 19:08:59 linux kernel: IPMI BT: timeout in RD_WAIT [ ] 1 retries left
Dec 12 19:08:59 linux kernel: BT: write 4 bytes seq=0x01 03 18 00 01
[...]
Dec 12 19:12:19 linux kernel: IPMI BT: timeout in RD_WAIT [ ]
Dec 12 19:12:19 linux kernel: failed 2 retries, sending error response
Dec 12 19:12:19 linux kernel: IPMI: BT reset (takes 5 secs)
Dec 12 19:12:19 linux kernel: IPMI BT: flag reset [ ]
Function wait_for_msg_done() use schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1) to
sleep 1 tick, so we should subtract jiffies_to_usecs(1) instead of 100
usecs from timeout.
Reported-by: Hu Shiyuan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Xie XiuQi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Use USEC_PER_SEC instead of 1000000, that making the later bugfix
more clearly.
Signed-off-by: Xie XiuQi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Remove unnecessary work pending test before calling schedule_work(). It
has been tested in queue_work_on() already.
Signed-off-by: Xie XiuQi <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
Remove unnecessary work pending test before calling schedule_work(). It
has been tested in queue_work_on() already. No functional changed.
Signed-off-by: Xie XiuQi <[email protected]>
Cc: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Remove unnecessary work pending test before calling schedule_work(). It
has been tested in queue_work_on() already. No functional changed.
Signed-off-by: Xie XiuQi <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Remove unnecessary work pending test before calling schedule_work().
It has been tested in queue_work_on() already. No functional changed.
Signed-off-by: Xie XiuQi <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Michael Hennerich <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
I got a "sched_setaffinity:: Invalid argument" error when using
err_injection_tool to inject error on a system with over 32 cpus.
Error information when injecting an error on a system with over 32 cpus:
$ ./err_injection_tool -i
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/err_inject//err_type_info
Begine at Tue Mar 26 11:20:08 2013
Configurations:
On cpu32: loop=10, interval=5(s) err_type_info=4101,err_struct_info=95
Error sched_setaffinity:: Invalid argument
All done
This because there is overflow when calculating the cpumask: the
type of (1<<k) is int, while mask[j] is unsigned long. When k > 31,
(1<<k) is truncated to ZERO, resulting in a unexpected cpumask.
Signed-off-by: Xie XiuQi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <[email protected]>
Xie XiuQi