mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-10-07 05:31:08 -04:00
Josh Poimboeuf
3c6f390080
This warning isn't very useful: why would you put ANNOTATE_NOENDBR on ENDBR, and if you did, what's the harm? And thus far it's only found one non-bug, where the '__end_entry_SYSENTER_compat' label happens to land on the ENDBR from entry_SYSCALL_compat: vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: entry_SYSCALL_compat+0x0: ANNOTATE_NOENDBR on ENDBR .. which is fine. Just remove the warning. Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/142341a5dafdfc788e4c95b9e226a6eefc9b626e.1660839773.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org
Linux kernel
============
There are several guides for kernel developers and users. These guides can
be rendered in a number of formats, like HTML and PDF. Please read
Documentation/admin-guide/README.rst first.
In order to build the documentation, use ``make htmldocs`` or
``make pdfdocs``. The formatted documentation can also be read online at:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/
There are various text files in the Documentation/ subdirectory,
several of them using the Restructured Text markup notation.
Please read the Documentation/process/changes.rst file, as it contains the
requirements for building and running the kernel, and information about
the problems which may result by upgrading your kernel.