Additionally, this commit streamlines the way unparseable files are handled, by giving them the AST of an empty file. This avoids bugs in the rest of the Autodoc logic trying to work with invalid ASTs.
I observed a stack overflow during x86_64 CodeGen in a debug compiler
compiled by the llvm backend. This happens while compiling
`main.buildOutputType` due to the Air being nested almost 500 levels.
This is all of the expected 0.14.0 progress on #21530, which can now be
postponed once this commit is merged.
This required rewriting the (un)wrap operations since the original
implementations were extremely buggy.
Also adds an easy way to retrigger Sema OPV bugs so that I don't have to
keep updating #22419 all the time.
The current zig fetch help docs tell the user to specify a package's URL, but it's unclear what the URL should be.
This change expands the help output to explain what URLs the zig fetch command can handle and provides examples of valid URLs.
Related: #20096
A git bundle file seems to be the more accurate term, as it's what git uses in its documentation: https://git-scm.com/docs/git-bundle
When using the LLVM backend, array copies were lowered as calls to
`llvm.memcpy.*` builtin which could cause recursive calls to memcpy to
be generated (observed with `-target x86_64-linux -mcpu x86_64+avx512vl
--debug-rt`).
By instead performing these small fixed-size copies with integers or
vectors the LLVM backend does not generate calls to the `llvm.memcpy`
builtin, and so (with `-fno-builtin`) recursive calls to memcpy will
not be generated by LLVM.
The assertions and (test build) runtime safety have been removed as they
may cause (mutually) recursive calls to memcpy in debug builds since the
panic handler generates calls to llvm.memcpy.
breaking change to the fuzz testing API; it now passes a type-safe
context parameter to the fuzz function.
libfuzzer is reworked to select inputs from the entire corpus.
I tested that it's roughly as good as it was before in that it can find
the panics in the simple examples, as well as achieve decent coverage on
the tokenizer fuzz test.
however I think the next step here will be figuring out why so many
points of interest are missing from the tokenizer in both Debug and
ReleaseSafe modes.
does not quite close#20803 yet since there are some more important
things to be done, such as opening the previous corpus, continuing
fuzzing after finding bugs, storing the length of the inputs, etc.
Ian Johnson