This commits adds the following distinct integer types to std.zig.Ast:
- OptionalTokenIndex
- TokenOffset
- OptionalTokenOffset
- Node.OptionalIndex
- Node.Offset
- Node.OptionalOffset
The `Node.Index` type has also been converted to a distinct type while
`TokenIndex` remains unchanged.
`Ast.Node.Data` has also been changed to a (untagged) union to provide
safety checks.
This function checks for various possibilities that are never produced
by the parser.
Given that lastToken is unsafe to call on an Ast with errors, I also
removed code paths that would be reachable on an Ast with errors.
The bitcode format always uses little endian words. Prior to this commit, a
bitcode file produced on e.g. aarch64_be or s390x would fail to be loaded by
LLVM.
Windows is a ridiculous operating system designed by toddlers, and so
requires us to close all file handles in the `tmp/xxxxxxx` cache dir
before renaming it into `o/xxxxxxx`. We have a hack in place to handle
this for the main output file, but the MachO linker also outputs a file
with debug symbols, and we weren't closing it! This led to a fuckton of
CI failures when we enabled `.whole` cache mode by default for
self-hosted backends.
thanks jacob for figuring this out while i sat there
The Bernstein-Yang inversion code was meant to be used only with the
fields we currently use for the NIST curves.
But people copied that code and were confused that it didn't work as
expected with other field sizes.
It doesn't cost anything to make it work with other field sizes,
that may support in the future. So let's do it.
This also reduces the diff with the example zig code in fiat crypto.
Suggested by @Rexicon226 -- Thank you!
Simliarly to shl_with_overflow, we first SHL/SAL the integer, then
SHR/SAR it back to compare if overflow happens.
If overflow happened, set result to the upper limit to make it saturating.
Bug: #17645
Co-authored-by: Jacob Young <jacobly0@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Bingwu Zhang <xtex@aosc.io>
This reverts commit dea72d15da, reversing
changes made to ab381933c8.
The changeset does not work as advertised and does not have sufficient
test coverage.
Reopens#22822
mainly this addresses the following use case:
1. Someone creates a template with build.zig.zon, id field included
(note that zig init does not create this problem since it generates
fresh id every time it runs).
2. User A uses the template, changing package name to "example" but not
id field.
3. User B uses the same template, changing package name also to
"example", also not changing the id field.
Here, both packages have unintentional conflicting logical ids.
By making the field a combination of name checksum + random id, this
accident is avoided. "nonce" is an OK name for this.
Also relaxes errors on remote packages when using `zig fetch`.
Techatrix